Service model
The audit process
A clear sequence so instrumentation work stays tied to audit decisions—rather than a pile of unrelated charts.
-
Frame — write the decisions that need proof
We map the automation arguments your team already has: stalled handoffs, silent failures, completion disputes, or release impact. Tooling talk waits until the questions are written down.
-
Inventory — list what applications already emit
Existing events, properties, and owners across workflow paths are listed without judgement. Duplicates and silent gaps become visible before anyone proposes a rebuild.
-
Dictionary — name the minimum trustworthy set
We draft the event language your engineering team can implement, with ownership and success criteria for each critical automation path.
-
Validate — prove sequences before you trust charts
Sample traffic is checked against expected handoffs. Broken steps are fixed in the instrumentation, not patched with dashboard filters.
-
Companion — keep the language honest after change
Optional audit cycle companions watch naming drift and metric fights, returning weekly notes while your automations keep shipping.
Place your workflows on this path
Most teams start with a workflow automation audit. If you already have a clean dictionary, say so in the contact form and we will suggest handoff instrumentation or a cycle companion instead.